Passing the popsicle test

| | Comments (2)

A while back I wrote about the "Popsicle Test" -- a measure of the walkability of a neighborhood. "An eight-year-old in the neighborhood should be able to bike to a store to buy a Popsicle without having to battle highway-size streets and freeway-speed traffic." I grew up in a neighborhood like that, but that's not the common experience of the kids in today's Tulsa. The reason has a lot to do with our outdated approach to regulating what kinds of activities can take place on a given parcel of land. Our system of zoning is all about separating different uses from each other, based on the assumption that it's a bad thing to have, for example, shops close to homes. Between our zoning laws and the understandable desire of developers and their financiers to minimize risk and go with the flow, we've developed a city where life is impossible without a car, something that becomes a problem when you're too young to drive, when you're too old or too handicapped to drive safely, or when gas gets above $2 a gallon.

There are other ways to regulate land use, and they promise to make life more predictable and less risky for homeowners and developers alike, to remove some of the contention from land use regulation, and to allow more creativity and variety, while protecting against situations that really do threaten property values, safety, and quality of life. One approach is to focus not on what goes on inside the building -- the use -- but the scale of the building and how it relates to its surroundings. It's called form-based planning, and next Wednesday night, TulsaNow is sponsoring a series of brief talks and a panel discussion on the subject.

"Passing the Popsicle Test: A Better Tulsa by Design" will be presented Wednesday, April 27, at 6:30 p.m. in the OSU-Tulsa Auditorium, just north of downtown. Speakers will include Jamie Jamieson, developer of the Village at Central Park; Russell Claus, Oklahoma City's Director of the Office of Economic Development; and me. There will be a panel discussion with questions and answers following the presentations.

Land use continues to be the central issue in Tulsa politics. Form-based planning may be a way to think outside the box and come up with a solution that will meet the needs of developers and property owners while helping us to create a more beautiful and livable city.


Don said:

Good point. But one other thought comes to mind in that when I was in grade school in the Chicago suburbs I would bike 2-3 miles away from my house for my "popsicle" (assortment of candy from 7-11). Nowdays, I'd never let my grade school child bike alone 2 or 3 miles away from home. Times have changed in that regard.

Jeff Shaw Author Profile Page said:

I was driving around this evening with my family, going to grandma's house and a photo exhibit, pondering this blog, and looking around at the commercial / residential "blocks" for lack of a better word, and believe you have a very good point.

We have here in this city distinct blocks of businesses, and distinct blocks of residential areas but hardly ever does there appear to be a "community," in which there are businesses that cater to the residences surrounding or adjoining. When you do encounter it, it doesn't fit very well. Look a Mingo and Garnett between 41st and 61st, for instance. Blech. We have now "pocket parks" why not pocket communities - self-contained (or nearly) housing and commercial development that works together to enhance each.

I guess I was lucky as a kid. I could ride my bike to three different little stores where I lived in Tulsa - I just didn't have a quarter for a popsicle. :) So it goes.

Very interesting thoughts, Michael

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Michael Bates published on April 21, 2005 7:25 AM.

F&M plat back on the agenda was the previous entry in this blog.

Charles Norman profiled is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.



Subscribe to feed Subscribe to this blog's feed:
[What is this?]