TfEI reaction to Supreme Court recall decision

| | Comments (1)

Rick Westcott, chairman of Tulsans for Election Integrity, has posted his reaction to the Oklahoma Supreme Court's decision not to assume original jurisdiction in the group's suit concerning the recall of Councilors Jim Mautino and Chris Medlock. Westcott addresses what the Court's action does and doesn't mean:

It's a little unfortunate that the Supreme Court's ruling does not address the issues of what the City Charter actually requires. Their ruling does not state whether there should have been a vote of five or if the City Clerk should have compared the actual signatures. We still believe that our position on those issues was, and is, correct. All the Court's ruling says is that the Justices do not believe that the facts of this case warranted the Court's assumption of original jurisdiction.

The full text of the Court's order:

Application to assume original jurisdiction is denied. All parties’ requests for costs and attorney’s fees are denied. ALL JUSTICES CONCUR.

Westcott ends his article with a call to tighten up the language concerning recall in the City Charter and a call to defeat the recall election on July 12. It will take money and volunteers to make that happen. Surf over to and offer to help in any way that you can.


Mike said:

It will be interesting to see how the votes shake out at tonight's meeting concerning the proposed new ethics rules for City employees. Wouldn't surprise me to see the Cockroach Caucus in unanimous opposition to implementation.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Michael Bates published on June 1, 2005 11:56 PM.

A dose of the Sith was the previous entry in this blog.

Dutch, French say no to Euro-nation is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.



Subscribe to feed Subscribe to this blog's feed:
[What is this?]