Global Spectrum can't get its question answered

| | Comments (1)

Dean Dennis of Global Spectrum, an unsuccessful bidder for the right to manage Tulsa's new arena and old convention center, flew to Tulsa on Thursday to ask a question: "How could they have more points on the scoring sheet for compensation?" "They" is SMG, the successful bidder, and the question refers to the fact that Global Spectrum made a lower (better) bid for compensation -- their management fees -- than SMG, and yet the committee that evaluated the bids ranked SMG higher in that category. No one answered his question. Chris Medlock has more on the story, with audio of the unanswered question. In this kind of a bid process, each evaluator ranks the bidders in each of several categories, and the ranking is added up for a total score. It's sort of like scoring a boxing match. It increasingly appears that the committee members tweaked their numbers in individual categories to make sure that SMG came out on top, even if SMG wasn't objectively the best bid in a particular category.

If companies don't think they'll get a fair hearing, who will want to do business with the City of Tulsa? I'm glad that Global Spectrum and Professional Bull Riders are making some noise about the way they were treated by Mayor Bill LaFortune, his staff, and his handpicked committee. Nothing will change until people are willing to speak out.

1 Comments

Bob said:

The closing comments in Global Spectrum Senior VP's protest letter to the City of Tulsa were quite insightful about how Tulsa Government really does business. To quote:

"In conclusion we are very disappointed with the selection process. I have personally been competing for private management contracts since 1988 and I have never filed a protest, but this situation is different Ė it is not simply 'sour grapes'. We canít help but feel that we were simply used to create the appearance of competition. We remain baffled as to why the City seems to be acting against its own best interests."

They feel they were simply used to create the appearance of competition. Quite the damning comment.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Michael Bates published on December 3, 2005 11:57 PM.

Coals (of fire) in the ACLU's stocking was the previous entry in this blog.

Please pray.... is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Contact

Feeds

Subscribe to feed Subscribe to this blog's feed:
Atom
RSS
[What is this?]