Better Hillary than Huckabee?

| | Comments (3) | TrackBacks (0)

A sampling of alarm and concern from conservative, pro-life bloggers about Mike Huckabee's views on foreign policy:

The editors of National Review worry about a repeat of the late '70s.

On Iran, Huckabee is at his most troubling. He accuses the administration of "proceeding down only one track with Iran: armed confrontation." This is false, and the kind of rhetoric you'd expect from DailyKos bloggers, not a Republican presidential candidate. Huckabee thinks it has been a lack of diplomatic engagement that has soured our relations with Iran: "We haven't had diplomatic relations with Iran in almost 30 years, my whole adult life and a lot of good it's done. Putting this in human terms, all of us know that when we stop talking to a parent or a sibling or a friend, it's impossible to accomplish anything, impossible to resolve differences and move the relationship forward. The same is true for countries."

This is the kernel of Huckabee's foreign policy. He wants to anthropomorphize international relations and bring a Christian commitment to the Golden Rule to our affairs with other nations. As he told the Des Moines Register the other day, "You treat others the way you'd like to be treated. That's to me the fundamental issue that has to be re-established in our dealings with other countries."

This is deeply naïve. Countries aren't people, and the world is more dangerous than a Sunday church social. Threats, deception, and -- as a last resort -- violence must play a role in international relations. Differences cannot always be worked out through sweet persuasion. A U.S. president who doesn't realize this will repeat the experience of President Jimmy Carter at his most ineffectual.

Reacting to the story above, Ace writes:

Not that what one blogger thinks matters that much, but if Huckabee gets the nomination, I'm voting Democratic. It's not just an idle threat; I just won't vote for him and in fact won't even vote third party or stay home. I'll vote for the Democratic candidate, even Hillary. I won't be a party to selling out everything the party is supposed to stand for to a liberal ideology. If we're going to have eight years of liberal rule, I'd rather the Democratic Party be governing, so at least they can take the blame....

And... I do not want Huckabee setting the agenda for the GOP as de facto head of the party. I'd rather there be a (different) liberal in the White House, with the GOP Congress and Senate free to pursue genuine conservative policies, rather than having to support Huckabee's liberal impulses.

Not to mention a Republican National Committee feeling duty-bound to back the president of their party, right or wrong.

Hot Air has video of Huckabee flip-flopping on the trade embargo of Cuba: He wrote a letter urging that it be lifted in 2002, but admits that he supports it now because he's running for President.

Frank J. of IMAO responds:

With Huckabee saying he was for restoring ties with Castro's Cuba while governor of Arkansas because, back then, he was unaware of the issues between the U.S. and Cuba, is he now becoming Obama dumb on foreign issues? Each day, I'm getting more and more scared of Huckabee's front runner status.

But Frank Rich likes Mike. That's Frank Rich, the left-wing columnist for the New York Times.

MORE: Did Mike Huckabee lose weight the old-fashioned way? One brand-new blogger thinks Huckabee fits the profile of a gastric bypass patient. But Gerard Vanderleun notes that it fits the profile of a hit blog -- a blog set up specifically to put an anonymous attack on a candidate in play. (So I've deleted the direct link for now.)

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Better Hillary than Huckabee?.

TrackBack URL for this entry:


s said:

Today, Hillary has lost her comfortable lead. Many democrat voters do not want a repeat of those horrible Clinton years. Bill's brother, Hillary's brother -- those Clinton relatives raised eyebrows during those 8 years and Hillary's horrible temper and I don't think anyone needs to put up with the marriage troubles of Bill and Hillary. Even with separate bedrooms at the White House, expensive trips they would take to avoid each other at taxpayer expense (it was not to help world peace)

Mitt Romney is way out nationally in front with Rudy G. and John McCain quite a few points behind Mitt and they are 2nd and 3rd. Many conservative voters are still going to vote for Mitt Romney at this point.

David V Author Profile Page said:

I think we're witnessing the "typical eastern snobbery" because a heartland candidate with heartland values is winning in a heartland caucus.

If Neil Bortz is comfortable with Huckaby, he's not that "scary".

For those who didn't watch the multiple "debates" this fall, Why is it that Huckaby was consistantly the top performance? Because he's a sensible, intelligent, and informed candidate.

It isn't just Huckaby that the eastern "progressives" don't like. They are prejudiced against what you and I represent, too.
Why?, because they're ignorant snobs.

s said:

Now the Clintons are targeting Obama's drug use.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Michael Bates published on December 11, 2007 6:08 PM.

Warrant woes was the previous entry in this blog.

Make the School Year Better, Not Longer is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.



Subscribe to feed Subscribe to this blog's feed:
[What is this?]