Cool and unusual

| | Comments (1) | TrackBacks (0) reports that American Airlines is looking for a 150-seat narrowbody aircraft to replace its fleet of MD-80s and 757s. The engines for this new short-haul fleet will need to make less noise, consume less fuel, and produce a lower volume of emissions. CFM (the GE / Snecma joint venture) and Rolls Royce are considering open-rotor technology for their next generation jet engines. Instead of the fan blades being inside a cowling, they'd be exposed. (Here's a photo of an open-rotor engine.)

This technology, and the promise that this could give a 25% to 30% improvement in efficiency, "seems to be really a paradigm shift in fuel consumption", says [American Airlines executive VP of operations Bob Reding].

He notes, however, that questions still need to be answered concerning the maximum cruise speed that aircraft can fly with open rotors, the noise characteristics and certification requirements.

"There will probably be some blade-out requirements," says Reding, adding that since certification requirements are not yet written "that is certainly one of the unknowns and certainly one of the issues that will have to be addressed".

By "blade-out" I think he means, "What happens if a rotor blade breaks off and goes spinning through the air like a ninja's throwing star?" Given that the United Air Lines DC-10 Sioux City crash was caused by fan blades from a cowled engine severing the hydraulic lines to the control surfaces, that could be an important thing to test.

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Cool and unusual.

TrackBack URL for this entry:


webworm Author Profile Page said:

I am not an aeronautical engineer. But, I have been flying since the age of 16, and I think I know a little about aircraft of different types. If the Boeing 737 is good enough for Southwest Airlines, then it should work for American Airlines. They already have them in the air, and pilot training is a very important cost factor. There is a lot more to fuel savings than open fan technology. The weight of the aircraft is important, and the overall aircraft design is a factor when considering fuel costs. In the long run, American will go with established technology. It will be the 737, or perhaps the latest CRJ models.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Michael Bates published on February 18, 2008 12:42 PM.

Who's in the clink? was the previous entry in this blog.

"no net economic loss" is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.



Subscribe to feed Subscribe to this blog's feed:
[What is this?]