How do you spend $10,923.88 on a non-campaign?

| | Comments (2) | TrackBacks (0)

One of the oddest of the latest batch of Tulsa City Council campaign contribution reports was Bill Martinson's ethics report.

Martinson, the councilor for District 5, was one of three unopposed candidates. The other two, Rick Westcott and John Eagleton, spent nothing on their campaigns. Westcott filed a statement of inactivity. Eagleton returned the handful of contributions he received.

But Bill Martinson raised and spent almost $11,000. That's not much below the amounts spent by candidates in competitive races. Eric Gomez and Maria Barnes in District 4 and Roscoe Turner and David Patrick in District 3 each spent between $12,000 and just over $13,000.

$9,001.15 of Martinson's spending was for "Personal services," $418.88 was for printing, and $1,323.77 was for "Advertising - general." The rest is listed as "Miscellaneous."

I could see an unopposed candidate putting out a single mailing to constituents saying thank you for another term and listing his accomplishments in the previous term. But who would you be paying $9,000 and what would that person be doing for that kind of money?

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: How do you spend $10,923.88 on a non-campaign?.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.batesline.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/3978

2 Comments

"Are you thinking what I'm thinking, Pinky?"

Jeff Shaw Author Profile Page said:

Council seats are expensive, Michael.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Michael Bates published on May 16, 2008 12:57 PM.

Bright signs, big QT was the previous entry in this blog.

The Boss swings is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Contact

Feeds

Subscribe to feed Subscribe to this blog's feed:
Atom
RSS
[What is this?]