Recently in Politics Category
A useful proxy for how forcefully congressional leaders press their priorities in the face of presidential opposition.
A handy reference to party headcounts since the advent of the Republican Party for the 1854 election.
Cruz's service as director of the Federal Trade Commission's Office of Policy Planning. Cruz developed policies that opened markets and reduced barriers to new entrants, and he almost always won the unanimous support of the bipartisan FTC board. According to the writers, who worked for Cruz at FTC, "a Cruz administration would seek meaningful change, and where possible, broad bipartisan support. Cruz is not one to nibble around the edges or bow to entrenched interests, but he does listen to experts and seek support from all quarters. If President Cruz becomes a reality, future historians might point to his time at the FTC as a harbinger of a presidency that is both conservative and consequential."
It's not enough to be right on the issues. Conservative voters have already seen what happens when they elect leaders who say the right things but refuse to take personal and political risks to effect change:
"'Americans are afraid their nation is in decline; they are going to lose the country they love,' [Republican consultant Alex] Castellanos says. 'They want a leader as big as their fears. Right now, a lot of Republicans see that big leader as Trump, and no else is at the big boys' table with him.'
"Castellanos contends that until a candidate proves he is 'big enough' to do the job, nothing else matters -- not being a conservative, not being a loyal Republican, not even major policy differences. 'What good is policy or ideology if you aren't big enough to get anything done anyway?'"
RELATED: Erick Erickson writes: "If Republicans in Washington will not stop this and defund Planned Parenthood, Republican voters should take any and all action to destroy the party at the ballot box. If this party will not fight this evil, it will fight no evil and should itself die."
It's rare that something makes the Republican Party look competent by comparison:
"'I would be the first to concede that we had failed to build a sturdy infrastructure for Democrats from the bottom up,' David Axelrod says. 'The Republican Party and supporting oligarchs like the Koch Brothers have invested exponentially more time and resources into building electoral strength from the grass roots up, concentrating on down ballot state offices, legislative races--even school board and City Council races. This has helped turn more than a few legislatures from blue to red, and also had created a larger pool of potential candidates for higher offices in the future.'"
Watergate prosecutor Fred Thompson:
"During the many talks, conferences and interviews I have participated in over the years about Watergate, one of the questions I'm almost always asked is why Nixon didn't destroy the tapes. I've always replied that his lawyers knew that he would have undoubtedly been charged with obstruction of justice, since the tapes arguably could have been subpoenaed as evidence in the matters that the Watergate Committee was investigating.
"Watching Team Hillary's performance over the past three weeks in damage control over her private email server and decisions to destroy potentially pertinent correspondence to at least one ongoing Congressional investigation, I have come to the realization that Nixon's main problem turned out to be that he just wasn't devious and tough enough. As you may recall, while Benghazi documents were under subpoena Hillary's cleanup crew wiped the hard drive of her server clean and deleted more than 30,000 emails. None related to work, she promises. She has long since learned that it is better to have people think you're lying than to give up evidence that proves it."
Amendments to the U. S. Constitution following the Bill of Rights. An interesting presentation because it includes five amendments that were sent to the States by Congress but which were not ratified, and notes questions about the validity of the ratification of other amendments.
There's a gap between Americans' experience of the economy and the rosy reports they hear from Washington. Tinkering with definitions is an easy way for government officials to make their economic performance look better than it really is, and it's a game that has been going on for years. Economist John Williams provides alternative calculations of key economic statistics, seeking to correct for the distortions that have been introduced into the numbers by nearly every administration since JFK's. From the site's primer:
"The first regular reporting of now-popular statistics such as gross national/domestic product (GNP/GDP), unemployment and the consumer price index (CPI) began in the decade following World War II. Modern political manipulation of the government's economic data began as soon as practicable thereafter, with revisions to methodology often incorporating positive reporting biases. As a result, investors and most economists, relying on the government's data, often miss underlying economic reality. "
Another article explains how the method for calculating the consumer price index has changed -- "CPI no longer measures the cost of maintaining a constant standard of living" -- and why it is to government's benefit to minimize the stated rate of inflation.
What's green on the outside and red on the inside? A watermelon? No, it's the climate alarmist protest movement. Zombie, the intrepid chronicler of way-out lefty protests in the San Francisco Bay Area, presents a thorough photo-documentary of the "People's Climate Rally" in Oakland, showing that the event was organized and dominated by explicitly socialist and communist groups arguing for "system change not climate change," a slogan promoted by Socialist Party USA. The ideological diversity of the march ranged from Leninists to Trotskyites, from Maoists to Castroites. Zombie noted two things you could find at every booth: Copies of the Communist Manifesto and anti-Israel material.
Via People's Cube, which writes, "The issue is never the issue, the issue is always the revolution."
A fascinating theory expounded by Zombie, the chronicler of far-left craziness. Progressives are lying about their motives with respect to gun control, abortion, climate change, junk food taxes, plastic bag bans, the welfare state, affirmative action, and nanny-statism, but conservatives are wrong about their true hidden motives. "Nanny statism is the modern progressive version of Jim Crow: regulations whose real intent is to oppress blacks, but now hidden behind the smiley-face mask of universal oppression."