More public money awarded to the folks behind the "private" toll bridge

| | Comments (3)

Just learned about this today:

Thursday night, after quietly posting notice 48 hours in advance, the board of the Tulsa Airport Improvements Trust awarded a contract for the next phase of the Federally-funded airport noise abatement project to Cinnabar Service Company, the same company that had the contract for earlier phases. Because of the late notice, Mayor Bill LaFortune, an ex officio member of the board, could not be present, and his designee, Allen LaCroix, Chief Operating Officer of the City, was not permitted to vote on the contract in his stead. Carl Clay, a relatively new appointee to the TAIT board, and a watchdog over airport operations, could not be present. Charles Sublett, another recent appointee to the TAIT board, abstained from the vote on the contract. The meeting was scheduled to coincided with the Tulsa City Council meeting so that even if councilors learned about it in time, they would be unable to attend. Because it was a special meeting, the meeting was not taped for broadcast on TGOV (Cox Cable channel 24).

So by a 2-0 vote, another $7.8 million (mainly Federal funds, with a small component of locally-collected passenger service fees) was awarded to a company whose principals also happen to be the principals in Infrastructure Ventures, Inc. (IVI), the company seeking to build a toll bridge across the Arkansas River to undeveloped land in the west part of the City of Bixby. Here is a chart of the connections between the players in Cinnabar, IVI, and county government.

The money for this project comes from FAA grants and is to be used either to buy out homeowners in the area affected by airport expansion or to remodel homes to provide sound insulation. The website for the project is called, and the home page has a description of the project and its history. One homeowner in the affected area has documented the sloppy, haphazard work that has been done by Cinnabar and its contractors. You'll find his collection of documents, photographs, and videos here. The concern is that Cinnabar is taking a large sum of money for insulating each house (in some cases more than the house itself is worth), contracting on the cheap to have the work done, and pocketing the difference.

Beyond the concern about the performance of the noise mitigation project itself, the timing of the award is interesting, just as work is set to get underway on the Bixby Bridge. Might the contract award to Cinnabar be used to provide a bit of working capital for IVI? I hope someone is keeping an eye on this, and I hope that once the full complement of the TAIT board is present safeguards will be put in place to provide a full accounting of funds supplied to Cinnabar and to prevent a minority of the board from awarding such a major contract, particularly at a hastily-called special meeting.

I hope the FAA is paying close attention, too.

UPDATE: The amount of the program extension was $7.8 million, not $3 million as I previously wrote. A small portion, either 5% or 10% -- I hear conflicting numbers -- is paid from locally-collected passenger service fees; the remainder comes from FAA grants.


Anon said:

Perhaps this is how the recall is being funded.

I wouldn't think a 2-0 vote on anything would pass muster. Can't wait for these guys to be exposed.

mad okie Author Profile Page said:

though the money "should" be used to buy out the houses that are affected the most, the city decided not to ask the FAA for that option, (though they claim the FAA was NOT buying out houses, they have shown no proof of that, even when asked), instead they went for the ones that they could line their pockets with first, then after a few years after the propery values drop even more (at their hands) they will come back to the FAA and ask for another 90% to buy the property out.

phase one: "soundproof" houses, Cinnebar pockets a minimum of 10-15k per house in administrative costs. 90% of the money comes from the FAA,

phase two: buy out the houses that are now worth less money because of the shoddy workmanship, and vibrations shacking the houses apart, again the FAA paying 90%

D.Schuttler said:

I just read it this morning and thought something seemed fishey too but whats new...

The division office of the FAA in our area takes the word of Hough and Remus as the absolute truth over others. Don't expect help unless our Senator steps up.

It's also interesting how Parmele is qouted in the last two TW articles that I've seen, saying part of the extra cost is removal of lead paint and asbestos. Sure would be interesting to see proof of this , since they claim it's not a remodel project and also in the past it was required of the homeowner to bring the house up to date(code wise) before they could start the work.

My house had a water leak due to cable guy knocking a pipe loose the week before. Cinnabar tested the water under the house first and I was told I would be responsible to pay to get it cleaned up, if it had been contaimenated water before they could start work under my house.

I find it hard to believe Cinnabar is finding asbestos at a high rate let alone paying to remove it from the funds. Most houses have been redone at some point since lead paint was removed from the market so this shouldn't be at a high rate around here either . Especially on an interior wall....

Thanks bringing this out to the public..

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Michael Bates published on July 2, 2005 5:03 PM.

Show and kvell: Kid photos from Little Rock was the previous entry in this blog.

Taking the Whirled to task is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.



Subscribe to feed Subscribe to this blog's feed:
[What is this?]