International observers call British voting system "corruptible"

| | Comments (1) | TrackBacks (0)

A team of 11 officials from Third World countries observing last Thursday's British election called the UK's approach to voting "corruptible," too dependent on trust. The observers came from countries where election fraud has often been a problem, with methods that include ballot box stuffing, voter intimidation, voter impersonation, and ballot theft.

Ababu Namwamba, an MP from Kenya, said he found the system "almost casual" in the way the whole process was so calm and so civil. He said: "While it may not be corrupt, it has elements that could be regarded as corruptible."

The Kenyan said he was surprised that more checks were not carried out to check the identities of voters. Instead clerks in the polling booths trusted the person who is voting to tell the truth.

He said: "That little detail is susceptible to abuse. It [the system] is admirable but it is open to abuse. This country has opened up to many people coming in.

"While the culture of trust may have worked in the past, your culture is changing. These details need to be tightened up."

Sheikh Fazle Noor Taposh, an MP from Bangladesh, suggested that staff in polling stations should demand to see photographic identification from voters.

This would ensure that people do not impersonate someone else when they voted. "It should move to a more foolproof system," he said.

Note the obvious but politically incorrect point made by the Kenyan MP: Immigration brings in many people who don't share a nation's culture. If they come in large enough numbers and are not inculcated with the values of their new home, institutions that depend on those values will founder.

This even applies to different political cultures within the United States: There are big cities where election cheating is proverbial and there are rural areas where such a thing is unthinkable. Imagine a small North Dakota town invaded by a critical mass of folks accustomed to Chicago-style machine politics.

(It should be said that many immigrants come to a country like Britain or the United States precisely because they prefer their new country's cultural assumptions to those of their homelands.)

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: International observers call British voting system "corruptible" .

TrackBack URL for this entry:


Bob said:

Militant organizations such as La Raza (with former Board Member and SUCO Justice Sonya Sotomayor guiding it) and La Mecha are exactly why we need photo I.D.'s to vote in any election, anywhere in the U.S.

These organizations advocate a Reconquista of the former lands of Mexico ceded to the U.S. in 1848.

Witness their militancy in the recent Cinco de Mayo dust-ups vis-a-vis the U.S. Flag.......

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Michael Bates published on May 11, 2010 12:46 AM.

Will Craig County mortgage its future for a community center? was the previous entry in this blog.

One Technology Fail: Tulsa Council meeting postponed for electronic bulletin board failure is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.



Subscribe to feed Subscribe to this blog's feed:
[What is this?]