Lahmeyer debtor suit went to garnishment

Jackson Lahmeyer has responded on Facebook to a last-minute mailer from the Mark Tedford campaign. The two are front-runners in the battle for the Republican nomination in Oklahoma's 1st Congressional District.

I wish I didn't have to do this, but unfortunately my opponent, Mark Tedford, has revealed his lack of character by running a false TV ad & mailer about me just 3 days before the election.

Mark can't win on the issues so he's resorting to false personal attacks. That's what career politicians do.

He claims over a decade ago that my wages were garnished by Sheridan Church. That's false.

I had a medical bill I was unaware of go to collections. Once I was notified of this, I paid the medical bill and have the Satisfactory Statement from the collector.

This is simply dirty politics.

We are the ONLY candidate endorsed by President Trump. The Swamp in DC is scared of our movement because they know we're not going to bend the knee to the establishment.

On Tuesday, June 16 take action and vote Jackson Lahmeyer. I will never let you down!

Here's the court case. If I'm reading the docket report correctly, it took Lahmeyer six months after he was served with the lawsuit, five months after the court ruled against him, to get around to paying, and that did not happen until a garnishment was filed and served to the church.

Typically a creditor doesn't file a suit until they've sent months of notices, followed by notices from the collection agency. Saying, "Once I was notified of this, I paid the medical bill," is dishonest spin.

It may be that Sheridan Church never paid a garnishment, but the church was served with a garnishment notice. Here's the timeline of key events from the docket report:

• 11-10-2016: Small claims initial filing for $1066.82
• 11-15-2016: Summons served on Jackson R. Lahmeyer
• 12-13-2016: Judgment against Lahmeyer for $866.82, plus $86 attorneys' fees and $93 court costs
• 05-02-2017: Garnishment affidavit with summons filed for $1,024.78
• 05-10-2017: Garnishment discharge filed
• 05-30-2017: Release from judgment

It's worth pointing out that this was shortly after Lahmeyer's divorce from his first wife, and it appears that he had sole custody of their child.

Tedford also had two similar small claims cases in which a medical bill went to collections. The first case, from 2011, appears to have been disputed, as Tedford's attorney entered appearance in the case shortly after the suit was served, and the plaintiff dismissed the case. In the second case, from 2017, the summons was served on July 8, 2017, and the case was dismissed on August 25, 2017, with no intervening entries on the docket, suggesting the bill was paid soon after the summons was received.

Medical bills do sometimes slip through the cracks, but taking six months to deal with the matter after being served with a lawsuit, rather than setting up a payment plan right away, to let things get to the point of garnishment, that seems irresponsible. Whether it ought to matter in a congressional race 9 years later is up for debate, but increasingly character matters as much as a candidate's platform. How are we going to trust you to fulfill your platform if you're not honest with us?